CDR logo The Council for Disability Rights
Advancing rights and enhancing lives of people with disabilities

CDR HOME

BOOKS

VIDEO

USEFUL LINKS

ABOUT CDR

HOW TO HELP



Want to receive
these monthly news
updates by e-mail?
Sign up!

July 2003

Gargoyle Award Celebration : October 17

The celebration will begin in the Waldorf Room on Friday, October 17th, at 6 PM with cocktails (from a cash bar) and hors d'oeuvres at the Hilton Hotel and Towers, 720 S Michigan in Chicago.

Invitations will be mailed in early September to all members with zip codes in Chicago and its suburbs (600s through 608s). All other members will receive raffle tickets in August.

Gargoyle awardees will be announced in the September newsletter.

GO Award descriptions

The Spirit of Service Betrayed

In his State of the Union address, President Bush spoke with apparent passion about marshaling the new public-spiritedness inspired by 9/11. He vowed to expand opportunities for meaningful national service, including those offered by AmeriCorps, President Bill Clinton's worthy domestic volunteer program. At appearances across the country, President Bush has touted his plan to "increase AmeriCorps by 50 percent" -- from about 50,000 members a year to 75,000.

Given the number of young people eager to participate, and the need for community service like tutoring at-risk children or cleaning up parks, even 75,000 volunteers seems like a modest gesture. But, sadly, this is yet another instance where the president's actions have not matched his "compassionate conservative" rhetoric. Instead of expanding AmeriCorps, Mr Bush is presiding over a major cutback in its spending and scope. That translates into devastating cuts for many localities and community service organizations across the nation that rely heavily on AmeriCorps members, who serve up to a year and receive a $4,725 educational stipend.

There is plenty of blame to go around for this debacle. Congress, for starters, approved a budget that not only slashed financing for AmeriCorps beneath the level the White House requested, but imposed a 50,000-member cap on the number of participants. Complicating matters is a disagreement between the General Accounting Office and the Office of Management and Budget over accounting rules. But the underlying problem is an absence of presidential leadership. President Bush never backed up his rhetorical support for expanding AmeriCorps with muscular lobbying to persuade Republicans in Congress to get on board. As a result, thousands of patriotic young people will be denied a chance to serve their country, and cash-strapped communities across the nation will be denied help they badly need. Longstanding local programs with expertise in effectively mobilizing volunteers to deliver needed services will be wiped out.

President Bush could begin to rescue the situation by quickly submitting a supplemental budget request that includes the money needed to prevent AmeriCorps from shrinking below 50,000 strong this cycle. But it is hard to be very optimistic that will happen.

Even amid cries for help from anguished community officials, the White House still refuses to acknowledge the extent of the damage, and the president's budget request for fiscal 2004 actually asks for $40 million less in AmeriCorps grants than he requested in 2003. That's strange behavior for a president supposedly committed to a robust program of national service.

Source: New York Times, 6-18-03

New Tutorials Announced for Implementing Section 508 Accessibility Standards

Since issuing its standards for electronic and information technology, the US Access Board has maintained a program of continuing on-line guidance and training on the requirements of the standards. These standards, issued under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, cover various means of disseminating information, including computers, software, websites, and electronic office equipment. Federal agencies must ensure that the technologies they procure are accessible according to the standards.

The Board has sponsored the development of a series of interactive web-based tutorials on different sections of the standards. The tutorials supplement previously released material and provide advanced guidance on how products can conform to the standards. In a couple weeks, three new courses will be made available that cover requirements for software applications and operating systems; desktop and portable computers; and self contained, closed products, such as information kiosks, calculators, and fax machines.

The courses will be part of the on-line "508 Universe" program which was developed by the Federal Information Technology Accessibility Initiative, an interagency partnership on the implementation of section 508. The program, which will be available on the Initiative's web site, also provides a user-friendly introduction to the law, information on buying compliant products, and previously released courses on designing accessible web sites and accessible video and multimedia.

The Board is developing guidance materials on section 508 requirements for telecommunications products that will also serve as the basis for an upcoming tutorial.

GO US Access Board

GO Federal Information Technology Accessibility Initiative

GO Additional information on developing accessible software

Source: US Access Board

Issues Identified Among Comments on Rights-of-Way Guidelines

Last year, the US Access Board released a draft of guidelines for accessible public rights-of-way, which it made available for public comment. The guidelines address access to public streets and sidewalks, including crosswalks, curb ramps, street furnishings, parking, and other components of public rights-of-way. By the close of the comment period in late October, the Board had received over 1,400 comments from persons with disabilities, disability groups, leading industry associations, civil engineers, transportation specialists, public works departments, and others. The Board has completed its review of the comments, which are posted on its web site, and has identified key issues raised by commenters. These include:

  • Alterations. The guidelines address access to newly built and altered public rights-of-way. Many comments expressed concern or confusion over how the guidelines would be applied in the context of "alterations," as defined in the guidelines. A reason for these concerns is that the intended application of the guidelines in public improvement projects and roadway work does not fully correspond to industry norms and conventions. (The Board has been aware of the need for additional guidance in this area and is working with former members of the Public Rights-of-Way Access Advisory Committee to develop a comprehensive design guide on achieving access in alterations which is due to be completed this year.)
  • Access for Persons with Vision Impairments. Access features at street crossings for people with vision impairments, namely detectable warnings and audible pedestrian signals, were addressed by the majority of comments. The guidelines included revised specifications for detectable warnings, a distinctive surface pattern of domes that are intended to provide a tactile warning of entry into streets where curb faces are absent, such as at curb ramps and blended transitions. The guidelines also included requirements for audible and tactile indicators where walk signals are provided at intersections. Comments, particularly those submitted by persons with vision impairments and advocacy groups, were strongly divided over requiring these features at all intersections. However, most commenters who identified themselves as visually impaired supported detectable warnings at certain locations, such as low-slope curb ramps and pedestrian islands, and backed requirements for audible pedestrian signals at complex intersections.
  • Traffic Roundabouts. Continuous-flow roundabouts, an increasingly popular alternative to signalized intersections, present unique challenges to access, particularly for people with vision impairments. The draft guidelines included a requirement for crossing signals at roundabout crosswalks to provide safer crossing. Comments from traffic engineers and others expressed concern about the impact since a key advantage of roundabouts is the absence of traffic signals.
  • On-street Parking. The guidelines included a requirement for accessible on street parking (at least one per block face). Comments advocated a scoping level that was more consistent with existing requirements for parking lots.
  • Crosswalks and Walk Signals. Comments expressed concern about impacts on street traffic flow of certain specifications that depart from industry practice, such as those for crosswalk width (8 feet instead 6 feet) and walk cycle timing (based on a speed of 3 feet per second instead of 4 feet).
  • Pedestrian Overpasses. The guidelines included a requirement for elevators at overpasses and underpasses with elevation changes over 5 feet. Questions were raised about such a provision discouraging the installation of overpasses and underpasses.

The Board is deliberating on these and other issues raised in the comments and how they can be addressed through revisions to the draft. Once this work is complete, the Board will release a revised set of guidelines and provide another opportunity for public comment.

GO US Access Board

Report Issued on Audible Pedestrian Signals

The US Access Board's draft guidelines for public rights-of-way provide criteria for audible pedestrian signals, as does the latest edition of a key industry resource, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. New technologies are available that enable audible signals to be incorporated into standard pedestrian signal systems. These products have improvements over older technologies, such as voice features and signals that automatically adjust to the ambient noise level. However, there has been confusion over their installation criteria and compatibility with existing signal controllers. Their installation involves important considerations concerning sound adjustment and wiring, among others.

A new report funded by the Board provides guidance on available audible pedestrian signal products and the interface with traffic signal controllers. The report provides detailed descriptions of available technologies and current and upcoming traffic controllers in the U.S., wiring and power requirements, and lessons learned from existing installations. The report, "Interfacing Accessible Pedestrian Signals with Traffic Signal Control Equipment," is now available.

READ Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

READ Interfacing Accessible Pedestrian Signals with Traffic Signal Control Equipment

Source: Great Lakes ADA and Accessible IT Center

DOJ Coaches Government Web Sites on Creating Accessibility Features

The US Department of Justice has posted a new technical assistance document titled "Accessibility of State and Local Government Web sites to People with Disabilities." This document provides guidance to State and local governments on how to make their web sites accessible and provides information resources for web developers.

Spread the word to your state and local entities!

READ Accessibility of State and Local Government Web sites to People with Disabilities

Source: Great Lakes ADA and Accessible IT Center

Disabled Least Likely to Use Internet, Says Study

Almost three-quarters of Americans who report having a disability also do not use the Internet, says a new study from The Pew Internet & American Life Project. Over a quarter of these respondents say their disabilities make it difficult or impossible to go online. "Currently, the disabled are less connected than many other groups of Americans," says the report.

"Just 38 percent of disabled Americans use the Internet," says the study. "This compares to the 58 percent of all Americans who use the Internet." Some 18 percent of survey respondents said they had disabilities -- "a percentage that is very close to the 20 percent of Americans that the U.S.Census Bureau reports with disabilities," says the study.

"Researchers Colin Keane and Joel Macht of the Neil Squire Foundation have noted that many of the disabled lack access to adaptive technologies that would help them use computers and retrieve information from Web sites. At times, it is physically hard for the disabled to gain access to wired rooms and buildings. Other times, computer work stations at public sites cannot be adjusted or lack appropriate desks, chairs, software or adaptive hardware to make the computer and Internet more usable. In addition, the disabled as a group are poorer than other Americans and have a hard time affording the extra expense of adaptive technology."

"It is important to note that respondents in our survey self-defined themselves as disabled or not," say the researchers. "They were asked if they had any disability, handicap, or chronic disease kept them from participating fully in work, school, housework, or other activities, and they then answered yes or no. In addition, respondents who said they were disabled were also allowed to self-define their disability as one that impairs the use of the Internet or one that does not.

"Thus, it is likely that some individuals (especially those who have little knowledge of the Internet and computers) believe their disability impairs Internet use when in fact it does not."

"There are social and psychological explanations why some Americans do not use the Internet," says the study's authors. "A person's sense of personal empowerment can make a difference in her decision to go online or not. Those who feel less in control of their lives are less likely to go online."

The Pew Internet & American Life Project is a non-profit initiative of the Pew Research Center for People and the Press.

READ The Ever-Shifting Internet Population: A new look at Internet access and the digital divide

Source: The Center for an Accessible Society

Park and Recreation Access Training Offered

The National Center on Accessibility will host the training "Retrofitting for Accessibility" September 22-25 in Gatlinburg MD. Designed for maintenance professionals, facility managers, architects, landscape architects, access coordinators and planners, this course provides education on federal legislation and accessibility requirements as applied to park and recreation facilities and programs.

Curriculum emphasis will include application of accessibility standards, barrier removal, safety issues associated with accessibility, and ongoing facility maintenance to assure optimum access for visitors with disabilities. Participants will learn how to identify barriers and initiate appropriate solutions for facility renovations beneficial to user groups of all abilities.

GO Registration information

Source: Great Lakes ADA and Accessible IT Center

Conference Will Address Internet Access Issues in Higher Ed

The University of Georgia, under a grant from the Southeast Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center, is hosting the second "Inspiration for Increasing Disability Access on Your Campus" conference for disability services providers in higher education. The one-day conference will be held Friday, September 19, in Knoxville, Tennessee, at the Knoxville Convention Center, and will be co-hosted by the University of Tennessee.

The conference will cover Internet accessibility issues in higher education, ADA requirements, and methods to create change in electronic accessibility in higher education.

SEND EMAIL Request a registration form

Source: Curtis D. Edmonds, Southeast Disability & Business Technical Assistance Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, 404/385.4033.

Cultural Arts Conference

The third annual meeting of the new national professional network of ADA/504 accessibility coordinators, managers and directors in the arts will be held at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington DC from August 5 to 7, 2003.

SEND EMAIL Request registration information

Source: Great Lakes ADA and Accessible IT Center

Letters

Mr. Joe Bartosch
WSCR Radio
455 North Cityfront Plaza, 6th
Chicago, Illinois 60611

1 June 2003

Dear Mr. Bartosch:

I recently heard you giving a tongue lashing to a perceived violator of the Disabled-Parking-Privilege-Necessity. As a disabled individual, I was pleased to hear you giving credence to what is often scorned as, "just another state handout which inconveniences 'Normal' people." Odd as it may seem, I urge you not to be so quick to judge those you visually perceive to be violating the Disabled-Parking-Privilege-Necessity. There are many with disabilities not as readily discernible as individuals who utilize a wheelchair or crutches.

Examples of non-visually apparent disabilities include individuals disabled by Head Trauma and/or Stroke who are able to walk a few steps, but no more.

Depending on the part of the brain affected, some apparently able-bodied individuals may have deficits which make it impossible to find their parking space, just seconds after leaving their car -necessitating an easily found, readily identifiable space.

Similarly, individuals with Neuro-muscular disorders may only be able to walk a few steps prior to disabling fatigue setting in. Examples include Parkinson's, Muscular Dystrophy, Cerebral Palsy and sometimes Alzheimer's. Further, able-bodied drivers sometimes park to pick up a disabled individual Properly used Special Needs Parking Placards are a vital source for expanding the often hyper limited universe of the Disabled This includes individuals readily identifiable as Disabled and those who aren't.

Thank you for raising awareness of the Disabled-Parking-Privilege-Necessity. Thank you for respecting its abuse for the degrading, insulting, unacceptable and illegal act it is. Thank you for your ongoing candor and concern.

Sincerely,

Aaron A. Lew, Stroke Survivor [773/274.8765]

Dear Sir or Madame,

My name is Diane Collins, and I am a disabled, pre-doctoral fellow from the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System. We are conducting a study on the "Functional, Psychological, and Economic Benefits of Service Dog Partnership".

The inclusion criteria for the study is that an interested person must be 18 years of age or older, and use a wheelchair or scooter as his or her primary means of mobility. I have 160 individuals enrolled in the study so far, but need more individuals in the control group, which is made up of individuals who use wheelchairs or scooters, and do not have service dogs. The study is a one-time survey that takes about one hour to complete. The survey and consents are mailed to interested persons. The surveys can be completed and then mailed to me, or I can interview interested people over the phone. Participants are reimbursed $20. for their time in completing the survey.

We have a web site that explains the study. If you can help spread the word about our study, we would sincerely appreciate it. Thanks very much.

READ Functional, Psychological, and Economic Benefits of Service Dog Partnership

Diane M. Collins, MA, OTR/L
Rehabilitation Science and Technology Department, University of Pittsburgh
Human Engineering Research Labs, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
7180 Highland Dr., Bldg. 4, 151R-1
Pittsburgh, PA 15206
phone: 412/365.4844 / fax: 412/365.4858

EDITOR'S NOTE: In response to popular demand, here's the letter I wrote for my clients who are concerned about the HIPAA privacy notices they're receiving. Since then, I've also discovered that the Illinois preemption analysis is on the web (on the governor's home page, no less) providing nice confirmation of my own point of view. Others may want to look for the similar analyses in their own states.

Ann Hilton Fisher, Executive Director
AIDS Legal Council of Chicago

TO MY HEALTH CARE PROVIDER:

I have received your notice telling me when you may disclose my personal medical information. Your notice does not mention whether or not you think you can disclose information regarding my HIV status or my mental health status.

I am writing to remind you that HIPAA provides that state laws which are more protective than HIPAA are still in force, and take precedence over HIPAA. 45 CFR 160.203 provides that HIPAA protections do not displace state laws that are "more stringent" than HIPAA's own requirements.

Both the Illinois AIDS Confidentiality Act 410 ILCS 305 et seq. and the Illinois Mental Health Confidentiality Act 740 ILCS 110 et seq. are state laws which are more protective than HIPAA. As a result, health care providers must continue to comply with the provisions of those laws. In particular, both laws require that information about diagnosis or treatment (whether for HIV or for mental health) may not be disclosed without a specific written consent from me, explicitly authorizing the disclosure of that information. Both laws provide clear penalties for health care providers who disclose information without the specific consent.

Please note then, that regardless of the contents of the privacy notice you have sent me, you may not disclose any information regarding my HIV status or any information about my mental health without my explicit written permission.

Thank you for continuing to respect my privacy in these important matters.

Sincerely yours,

Josephine Consumer

Enforcing the ADA: A Status Report from DOJ

The US Department of Justice has recently posted their Status Report for October through December 2002. Through lawsuits and both formal and informal settlement agreements, the Department has achieved greater access for individuals with disabilities in thousands of cases. Under general rules governing lawsuits brought by the Federal Government, the Department of Justice may not file a lawsuit unless it has first unsuccessfully attempted to settle the dispute through negotiations.

READ Enforcing the ADA

Source: Great Lakes ADA and Accessible IT Center

Memo to Disability Community Members

By Kevin Irvine, Senior Transportation Advocate, Equip for Equality

The Americans with Disabilities Act requires public transit agencies to provide "paratransit" services to people with disabilities who cannot use the fixed route bus or rapid rail, due to their disability (or access barriers). Unfortunately, some people with disabilities may not know how to effectively advocate for themselves when they are applying for ADA paratransit certification (or re-certification). As a result, some people may be denied paratransit services to which they are legally entitled. To help address this problem, Equip for Equality (EFE) partnered with Marilyn Golden of Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF) to create a new publication, "ADA Paratransit Eligibility: How To Make Your Case." EFE also received valuable feedback from some people with disabilities for an early draft of this document. This handout is designed to assist people with disabilities, advocates, agency staff, and/or family members in understanding how a person can effectively advocate for him/herself in the paratransit eligibility process. For a copy, call EFE 312/341.0022.

Since this publication is designed to be applicable to anyone, in any region of the country, it does not include information specific to any one city, state or region. If you live in the greater Chicago area, you can obtain information about applying for paratransit by contacting the Regional Transportation Authority's Paratransit Certification Program at 312/663.HELP (4357) or 312/913.3122 TTY or check out RTA's web site.

If you have any questions about this handout, please feel free to contact me directly. If you have feedback on its content or design, please let me know so that your feedback can be considered if this handout is revised or updated in the future.

GORegional Transportation Authority's Paratransit Certification Program

Disabled 'Priced Out' of Rental Market

By Angela Carter, Register Staff

People with disabilities are now "priced out" of the rental housing market, according to a national study released Friday. Authors of "Priced Out in 2002" found that, for the first time in US history, the average national rent for modest, one-bedroom units -- ranging from $320 to $1,425 -- was greater than the monthly income that Americans with disabilities receive from the federal Supplemental Security Income program. ...

Of the nation's 2,702 market areas, none had modestly priced rents for efficiency or one-bedroom units that were affordable for the nearly 1.4 million people on SSI who were living in communities last year, the report said.

Hundreds of thousands were in institutions, nursing homes and board facilities with costs covered by government funds. ... People with long-term disabilities received $545 per month in 2002. ...

"Priced Out" was published by the Boston-based Technical Assistance Collaborative and the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities Housing Task Force in Washington, D.C., and funded by the Melville Charitable Trust. ...

The report recommends increasing production of affordable housing units for the lowest income Americans, including people with disabilities, restoring cuts to federally funded housing programs that benefit people with disabilities, and setting aside more affordable units. ...

Source: The New Haven Register, 5/31/03

Visitable Housing in Bolingbrook

Ed Bannister, Past Pres. of the Coalition of Citizens with Disabilities in Illinois, and his CCDI chapter have brought visitability to Bolingbrook. Thanks to his work, visitability is now the governing principle for 10% of new homes in Bolingbrook. The State has committed a million dollars to repay local developers for costs incurred.

For more information, contact Ed at 630/739.1556, x.2.

For Sale: Red Ranger Safari Scooter

Brand new, w/ power seat. Must sell; asking $2500. Call Charlie at 847/526.2629.

Free for the Taking

2 folding walkers (w/o wheels)
1 raised toilet seat
2 pair, underarm crutches

Call Wanda at 773/625.2834.


Council for Disability Rights

Knowing your rights is the easy part. Exercising them can be a bit trickier.

Approved by Bobby v3.1